CIRIS

Emerging Scholars Series

Vol. 7 (2026): Panoply Journal

Disaster Diplomacy in developed and developing countries: Comparative perspectives on the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami and the 2011 Japan Tsunami 

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71166/vregw445
Submitted
28 May 2026
Published
26 September 2026

Abstract

This article examines the role of disaster diplomacy in developed and developing countries through a comparative analysis of two major natural disasters: the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami and the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami in Japan. Both events were among the most devastating natural disasters in modern history, causing massive human casualties, displacement, infrastructure destruction, and significant humanitarian crises. The 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami resulted in approximately 250,000 deaths and affected multiple countries, particularly Aceh in Indonesia and Sri Lanka, while the 2011 disaster in Japan caused extensive destruction and was further complicated by the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident.

The aim of this study is to analyse the relationship between natural disasters, humanitarian assistance, and diplomatic activity in different political and developmental contexts. The research applies a qualitative comparative case study approach based on secondary sources, including academic literature, reports of international organisations, and governmental data. Particular attention is devoted to the organisation of humanitarian aid, international cooperation, crisis management, and the influence of domestic political conditions on the effectiveness of relief efforts.

Findings indicate that, despite major differences in economic development and institutional capacity, both developing and highly developed countries faced significant challenges in responding to disasters of such magnitude. In Aceh, the tsunami contributed to political transformation and peacebuilding processes, whereas in Sri Lanka political tensions affected the distribution of humanitarian aid and diplomatic engagement. In Japan, although state institutions and infrastructure were highly advanced, the scale of the disaster and the nuclear crisis exposed vulnerabilities in national preparedness and crisis coordination.

In this article, the study demonstrates that natural disasters can significantly influence diplomatic relations, humanitarian and domestic political dynamics. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of international assistance, strategic coordination and disaster preparedness in mitigating the consequences of large-scale catastrophes. The article contributes to the broader discussion on disaster diplomacy by comparing how developed and developing countries respond to extreme natural disasters as well as how such events shape international and domestic political processes.

 

Keywords

tsunami 2011, Japan, humanitarian aid, disaster management, disaster preparedness, tsunami 2004, humanitarian aid, disaster diplomacy, Aceh, Sri Lanka

 

References

  1. Bradley, M. (2023). The politics and everyday practice of international humanitarianism. Oxford University Press.
  2. Catholic Information Agency (KAI). (2011, May 6). Caritas Polska for Japan. EKAI. https://www.ekai.pl/caritas-polska-dla-japonii/.
  3. Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. (n.d.). Tsunami early warning. Retrieved August 27, 2026, from Tsunami Early Warning | CTBTO.
  4. Dunbar, P. K., McCullough, H. M., Mungov, G., Varner, J., & Stroker, K. (2011). 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami data available from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National Geophysical Data Center. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 2(4), 306–317.
  5. Encyclopaedia Britannica. (n.d.). Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). Retrieved March 24, 2026, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Liberation-Tigers-of-Tamil-Eelam.
  6. Fujii, Y., Satake, K., Sakai, S., Shinohara, M., & Kanazawa, T. (2011). Tsunami source of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake. Earth, Planets and Space, 63(7), 815–820.
  7. Gaillard, J.-C., Clavé, E., & Kelman, I. (2008). Wave of peace? Tsunami disaster diplomacy in Aceh, Indonesia. Geoforum, 39(1), 511–526.
  8. International Atomic Energy Agency. (n.d.). Fukushima observations: Knowledge management portal on the observations and lessons from the Fukushima Daiichi accident. Fukushima Observations - default.
  9. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2011, June 3). IAEA activities in response to the Fukushima accident: Report by the Director General (GOV/INF/2011/8).
  10. International Medical Corps. (n.d.). Japan earthquake and tsunami: Our response. Retrieved May 30, 2026, from https://internationalmedicalcorps.org/emergency-response/japan-earthquake-tsunami/
  11. Japan NPO Center. (n.d.). Tohoku disaster relief. Retrieved May 30, 2026, from https://www.jnpoc.ne.jp/en/what-we-do/tohoku-disaster-relief/.
  12. Le Billon, P., & Waizenegger, A. (2007). Peace in the wake of disaster? Secessionist conflicts and the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(3), 411–427.
  13. Løvholt, F., Harbitz, C. B., Nadim, F., Birkmann, J., Setiadi, N. J., Bach, C., & Fernando, N. (2014). Tsunami risk reduction: Are we better prepared today than in 2004? United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.
  14. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2012). Diplomatic bluebook 2012: International situation and Japan’s diplomacy in 2011. MOFA.
  15. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (n.d.). What is a tsunami? National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Retrieved May 30, 2026, from https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/tsunami.html.
  16. Nippon Foundation. (2011, November 14). International expert symposium in Fukushima – Radiation and health risks. https://en.nippon-foundation.or.jp/news/articles/2011/20111114-20824.html.
  17. Nishikiori, N., Abe, T., Costa, G. M., Dharmaratne, S. D., Kunii, O., & Moji, K. (2006). Who died as a result of the tsunami? Risk factors of mortality among internally displaced persons in Sri Lanka: A retrospective cohort analysis. BMC Public Health, 6, Article 73, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-73.
  18. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency. (2021). Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident, ten years on: Progress, lessons and challenges (NEA No. 7558). OECD Publishing.
  19. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency. (2017). Impacts of the Fukushima Daiichi accident on nuclear development policies. OECD Publishing.
  20. Reconstruction Agency, Government of Japan. (n.d.). Reconstruction Agency—English. Retrieved May 30, 2026, from https://www.reconstruction.go.jp/english.
  21. Sato, S. (2015). Characteristics of the 2011 Tohoku tsunami and introduction of two-level tsunamis for tsunami disaster mitigation. Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B, 91(6), 262–272.
  22. Stokke, K., Törnquist, O., & Sindre, G. M. (2009). Conflict resolution and democratisation in the aftermath of the 2004 tsunami: A comparative study of Aceh and Sri Lanka. PCD Journal, 1(1–2), 132–147.
  23. Telford, J., & Cosgrave, J. (2006, July). Joint evaluation of the international response to the Indian Ocean tsunami: Synthesis report. Tsunami Evaluation Coalition.
  24. U.S. Department of State. (2004, December 29). Tsunami disaster requires “worldwide response,” Powell says. https://usinfo.org/wf-archive/2004/041229/epf303.htm.
  25. U.S. Geological Survey. (2018, October 8). Tsunami generation from the 2004 M=9.1 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/pcmsc/science/tsunami-generation-2004-m91-sumatra-andaman-earthquake.
  26. World Health Organization. (2013). Tsunami 2004: A comprehensive analysis. WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/978.